Evaluation of the implementation of school exams using the brinkerhoff model in physics subjects in senior high school
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v18i2.4755Published:
2023-03-30Issue:
Vol. 18 No. 2 (2023): March 2023Keywords:
Evaluation, Brinkerhoff Model, PhysicsArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
School exam is one of the benchmarks of student learning outcomes as a test that is expected to provide information on the ability of students that can be used to consider and describe the achievement of students, especially in physics subjects. This study aims to describe the suitability of fixed vs. emergent design, formative vs. summative design, experimental design, and quasi-experimental vs. natural inquiry evaluation of the implementation of school exams in physics subjects in high school. This research uses the Brinkerhoff evaluation model proposed by Robert O. Brinkerhoff. The method used in this research is quantitative, and this type of research is evaluative. The data collection technique used a questionnaire, supported by observation and documentation, and a literature study to give meaning to the research results. The results showed that overall the organization of school exams in physics subjects in high school was very good. In the fixed vs. emergent design component, a total average of 95% is obtained from the teacher's perspective and 87% from the student's perspective, which is very good. Furthermore, for the formative vs. summative design component, a total average of 94% was obtained from the teacher's perspective and 88% from the student's perspective, which was in the excellent category. Then the experimental design and quasi-experimental vs. natural inquiry obtained a total average of 96% in the teacher's perspective and 88% in the student's perspective, which is in the excellent category. Thus, the implementation of school exams in physics subjects in high school is very good, but further research needs to be carried out to analyze, maintain, and at the same time improve what is lacking in terms of organizing school exams, starting from the preparation, implementation, and closing stages.
References
Sahara, U., Qaddafi, M., & Baharuddin, B. (2018). Efektivitas Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Beraturan Video Based Laboratory Terhadap Peningkatan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika. JPF (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika)Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, 6(2), 57-64.
Irianto, Y. B. (2011). Kebijakan pembaruan pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Putra Chrisna Rian Rendy dan Sugihartono Tri. 2019. Penerapan alogaritma fisher-sufhle pada komputer based tes ujian sekolah di SMKN 1 payung. Pangkal Pinang: STMIK Atma Luhur. Jurnal Matrik. 18(2), 276-283.
Sari, A. W., Mudjiran, M., & Alizamar, A. (2017). Tingkat kecemasan siswa dalam menghadapi ujian sekolah ditinjau dari jenis kelamin, jurusan dan daerah asal serta implikasi. Jurnal Bioteknik (Bimbingan dan Konseling: Teori dan Praktik), 1(2), 37-72.
Nurjanah, A. (2018). Pengukuran keberhasilan diklat melalui model evaluasi Kirkpatrick. Jurnal Diklat Keagamaan. 12(32), 71-82.
Suardipa, I.P, & K.H (2020). Peran desain evaluasi pembelajaran untuk meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran. Widyacarya: Jurnal Pendidikan, Agama dan Budaya, 4(2), 88-100.
Harfiani, R., & Setiawan, H.R. (2019). Model Penilaian Pembelajaran Di Paud Insklusif. Ihya Al-Arabiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Arab, 5(2), 235-243.
Yuniarti, Y., Abdiyah, L., Nurjannah, S., Siregar, S. L., & Riani, P. (2021). Penilaian Evaluatif Dalam Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: IAN AN Nur Lampung. Jurnal Pendidikan dan sosial budaya. 1(1), 73-87.
Maison, A., Kurniawan, D.A., & Sholihah, L.R. (2018). Deskripsi sikap siswa di Batanghari berdasarkan indikator normalitas ilmuan, adopsi dari sikap ilmiah, ketertarikan memperbanyak waktu, dan ketertarikan berkarir di bidang fisika. Edu Sains, 10(1), 160-167.
[Suryani N. A., Sakti, I., & Purwanto, A. (2018). Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Antara Model Pembelajaran Clis (Childrent’s Learning In Science) dengan menggunakan media Kit IPA di SMP Negeri 21 kota Bengkulu. Bengkulu: Universitas Dahasen Bengkulu. Jurnal: Journal of sience education. 2(1), 113-116.
Halim, A, Suriana, S., & Mursal, M. (2017). Dampak problem based learning terhadap pemahaman konsep ditinjau dari gaya berfikir siswa pada mata pelajaran Fisika.. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(1), 1-10.
Tasya, N., & Agung, A. P. (2019). Faktor Penyebab rendahnya hasil belajar. IN Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika (pp.660-663).
Handayani, E. S., & Subakti, H. (2021) Pengaruh Disiplin Belajar terhadap Hasil Belajar Bahasa Indonesia di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 2021, 5.1: 151-164.
Novita, L., Sukmanasa, E., & Pratama, M. Y. (2019). Penggunaan media pembelajaran video terhadap hasil belajar siswa SD. Indonesia. Primary Education.3(2), 64-72.
Mahajan, M., & Singh, M.K.S (2017). Importance and benefits of learning outcomes. IOSR Journal Of Humanities and Social Science, 22(03) 65-67.
Susanto R., Rachmadtullah, R., & Rachbini, W. (2020). Technological and pedagogical models: Analysis of factors and measurement of learning outcomes in education. Journal Of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 1-4.
Arikunto S. (2015). Dasar-Dasar Pendidikan Evaluasi Edisi 2. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Mirawati, I., Erlandia, D. R., & Octavianti, M. (2017). Komunikasi Nonverbal Penyontek: Studi Terhadap Cara Mendeteksi Perilaku Menyontek Oleh Para Pengawas Ujian. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi. (JKMS) 6(2), 212-223.
Aljihad, F., Sulastini, R. & Handayani, S. (2021). Implementasi Manajemen Sistem Penilaian Pembelajaran Secara Daring(Studi Kasus Di SMA Negeri 1 Cilacap). Jurnal Tawadhu, 5(2), 230-246.
Narsinta, Y. A., Ismanto, B., & Rina, L. (2020). Sistem Asesmen Kompetensi Dasar Penetapan Kelulusan SMA Negeri 2 Salatiga (Studi Perspektif Guru Sebagai Agen Pembelajaran). Jurnal Paedagogy, 9(4), 704-715.
Heriyanti, Y. (2021) Sistem Informasi Pencetakan Kartu Peserta Ujian di SMA Negeri 6 Kota Bengkulu. Jurnal Dinamika Informatik, 10(2), 27-38.
Caswita, C. (2021). Analisis Implementasi Kebijakan Ujian Sekolah Berstandar Nasional (USBN) Pai Sd Dalam Mewujudkan Mutu Kelulusan Peserta Didik Di Sekolah. EduStream. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 5(2), 96-117.
Ismah, Z., & Ernawati, T. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Teams Games Tournament (TGT) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ipa Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Ditinjau Dari Kerjasama Siswa. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 13(1), 82-85.
Syazali, M., & Ilhamdi, M. L. (2022). Implementation of online learning and its impact on student science competency. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 17(2), 192-198.
Rifa’i. M., Ananda, R., & Fadhli, M. (2018). Manajemen peserta didik (Pengelolaan peserta didik untuk efektifitas pembelajaran). Cv. Pusdikra Mitra Jaya.
Aslam, M., Azis, A. A., & Adnan, A. (2021). Pengembangan E-lkpd Berbasis Salingtemas (Sains Lingkungan, Teknologi, Masyarakat) Materi Perubahan Lingkungan Kelas X SMA. Jurnal Biotek, 9(2), 224-243.
Numa, N. A. S., & Martini, M. (2022). Application of guided inquiry student worksheet on additive materials to improve the science process skills of junior high school students. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(4), 424-429.
Author Biographies
Rabiyanti B. Kamali, Physics Education Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Masri Kudrat Umar, Physics Education Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Dewi Diana Paramata, Physics Education Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Supartin Supartin, Physics Education Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Tirtawaty Abdjul, Physics Education Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Dewa Gede Eka Setiawan, Physics Education Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rabiyanti B. Kamali, Masri Kudrat Umar, Dewi Diana Paramata, Supartin Supartin, Tirtawaty Abdjul, Dewa Gede Eka Setiawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
