Analysis of Students' Critical Thinking Skills on Heat and Temperature Topic: A Diagnostic Study on Grade VII Junior High School Students
DOI:
10.29303/jpft.v12i1.12169Published:
2026-06-28Downloads
Abstract
Critical thinking is an essential competency in 21st-century science learning that supports students in analyzing information, solving problems, and making evidence-based decisions. However, the profile of junior high school students' critical thinking skills on the topic of temperature and heat has not been comprehensively mapped using indicator-level diagnostic data. This study aims to describe the critical thinking profile of seventh-grade students at SMPN 4 Mesuji Makmur on the topic of temperature and heat, based on Ennis's (2011) five critical thinking aspects and 12 indicators, using a descriptive instrument supported by qualitative interview data. A quantitative descriptive approach supported by qualitative interview data was employed. Subjects comprised 94 seventh-grade students selected through total sampling. The instrument was a 25-item multiple-choice critical thinking test based on 12 Ennis (2011) indicators (2–3 items per indicator), validated by two expert lecturers through Content Validity Ratio (CVR ≥ 0.42), Product Moment correlation (r > 0.361), and Cronbach's Alpha reliability (α = 0.78). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, & Saldaña (2014). Results showed that the average critical thinking achievement was only 46.77% (SD = 8.43), in the low category (Arikunto, 2013), with 71 students (75.5%) in the low category, 18 students (19.1%) in the medium category, and 5 students (5.3%) in the high category. All five aspects were low: providing simple explanation (47.47%), building basic skills (43.94%), inferring (45.45%), providing advanced explanation (43.94%), and managing strategies and tactics (53.03%). Building basic skills and providing advanced explanation were the weakest aspects. These findings suggest the need for inquiry-based and practicum-oriented instruction specifically targeting observational reasoning and conceptual definition skills in temperature and heat learning.
Keywords:
Critical Thinking Temperature and Heat Diagnostic Quantitative Analysis Quantitative DescriptiveReferences
Agus, I., & Purnama, A. N. (2022). Critical thinking skills of junior high school students. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 7(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.33369/jpmr.v7i1.19963
Anggraeni, D. M., Prahani, B. K., Suprapto, N., Shofiyah, N., & Jatmiko, B. (2023). Systematic review of problem-based learning research in fostering critical thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101334
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.
Billah, A., Masykuri, M., Sarwanto, & Sajidan. (2021). Analysis of critical thinking in junior high school students through science learning in Indonesia: A systematic review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796(1), 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012013
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press. https://doi.org/10.2505/9781936959254
Chairatunnisa, A., Marlina, L., & Wiyono, K. (2023). Improvement of critical thinking skills of junior high school students on heat transfer material. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 10377–10386. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5681
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Dores, O. J., Wibowo, D. C., & Susanti, S. (2020). Analysis of students’ critical thinking skills. J-PiMat, 2(2), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.31932/j-pimat.v2i2.889
Doyan, A., Melita, A. S., & Makhrus, M. (2023). Increasing critical thinking skills through the development of STEM-based physics learning media on temperature and heat. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(6), 4096–4102. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.3724
Ennis, R. H. (2011). Critical thinking: Reflection and perspective. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 26(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryct20112615
Facione, P. A. (2020). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment. https://insightassessment.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts.pdf
Fahim, M., & Masouleh, N. S. (2012). Critical thinking in higher education: A pedagogical look. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(7), 1370–1375. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.7.1370-1375
Fitriani, F., Supeno, S., & Wahyuni, S. (2021). Critical thinking skills in science learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(3), 378–385. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i3.30891
Harun, L., & Pramasdyahsari, A. S. (2023). The effectiveness of the STEM integrated project-based learning model on the critical thinking skills of junior high school students. Indiktika, 5(2), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.31851/indiktika.v5i2.11619
Khoiri, N., Ristanto, S., & Kurniawan, A. F. (2023). Project-based learning via traditional game in physics learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(2), 286–292. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i2.44071
Kurniahtunnisa, K., Anggraito, Y. U., Ridlo, S., & Harahap, F. (2023). STEM-PjBL learning: The impacts on students’ critical thinking, creative thinking, communication, and collaboration skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(7), 5007–5015. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.4456
Kurniawan, R., Sari, M., & Lestari, P. (2022). Miskonsepsi siswa pada materi suhu dan kalor. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 11(2), 101–110.
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Meirbekov, A., Maslova, I., & Gallyamova, Z. (2022). Digital education tools for critical thinking development. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101023
Meryastiti, V., Ridlo, Z. R., & Supeno, S. (2022). Identification of critical thinking skills in science learning for students of SMP Negeri 1 Glenmore, Banyuwangi Regency. Saintifika, 24(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.19184/saintek.v24i1.27695
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1
Perkins, K. (2020). Transforming STEM learning at scale: PhET interactive simulations. Childhood Education, 96(4), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2020.1796451
Rahmawati, N., Supeno, S., & Wahyuni, S. (2022). The effect of inquiry worksheet on students’ critical thinking skills in junior high school physics learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(2), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i2.35128
Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2021). Teaching and learning 21st century skills: Lessons from the learning sciences. Asia Society.
Sari, N., Hidayat, T., & Putri, R. (2023). Analisis kesulitan belajar siswa pada konsep suhu dan kalor. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 11(1), 88–97.
Setiawan, B. (2023). Profile of critical thinking skills in science learning class at junior high school on additive materials. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 4(3), 288–298. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v4i3.288
Sinaga, P., Setiawan, W., & Liana, M. (2022). The impact of electronic interactive teaching materials (EITMs) in e-learning on junior high school students’ critical thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101066
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suradika, A., Dewi, H. I., & Nasution, M. I. (2023). Project-based learning and problem-based learning models in critical and creative students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(1), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i1.35177
Taufiq, M., & Rokhman, F. (2017). Pembelajaran IPA kontekstual dan pemahaman konsep siswa. Journal of Education Research, 5(2), 89–98.
Utami, W., Kurniawan, D. A., & Kuswanto, K. (2022). Science process skills and critical thinking in science learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(2), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i2.35128
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-century skills and 21st-century digital skills for workers: A systematic literature review. SAGE Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Masduki Masduki, Hamdi Akhsan, Ketang Wiyono, Melly Ariska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi (JPFT) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi (JPFT).
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Downloads
How to Cite
