AI-Supported Virtual STEM Learning for Enhancing Twenty-First Century Skills in Physics: A Literature Review
DOI:
10.29303/jpft.v12i2.12671Published:
2026-08-30Downloads
Abstract
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into educational contexts has significantly reshaped the landscape of teaching and learning, particularly within Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education. Physics, as a discipline characterized by abstract concepts and complex problem-solving processes, often presents challenges for learners when approached through conventional instructional methods. In response, AI-supported virtual STEM learning environments have emerged as a promising alternative, offering interactive, adaptive, and personalized learning experiences. This study aims to explore how AI-supported virtual STEM learning contributes to the development of twenty-first century skills, including critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, and digital literacy. Employing a literature review approach guided by the PRISMA framework, this study systematically identifies, screens, and analyzes relevant scholarly articles published between 2018 and 2024. The analysis focuses on identifying patterns in instructional design, types of AI technologies used, and their pedagogical impact on physics learning. The findings indicate that AI-driven tools—such as intelligent tutoring systems, adaptive simulations, and virtual laboratories—can enhance student engagement and foster higher-order thinking skills. These technologies enable learners to actively construct knowledge, experiment in safe virtual environments, and receive immediate feedback tailored to their learning needs. However, the review also reveals that the number of empirical studies in this area remains limited, indicating that the field is still in a developmental stage. This study contributes to the growing body of knowledge by synthesizing current research and highlighting both the opportunities and limitations of AI integration in physics education. It also underscores the need for more comprehensive and methodologically rigorous studies to strengthen the evidence base.
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence Twenty-First-Century Skills Virtual STEM LearningReferences
Amanah, S., et al. (2023). The use of PhET simulations to enhance students’ problem-solving skills in physics learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(2), 145–156.
Badeo, J., & Duque, R. (2022). Socio-scientific issues approach in improving scientific literacy and reasoning skills. International Journal of Science Education, 44(5), 789–805.
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2), 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119
Flegr, J., et al. (2023). Integration of real and virtual experiments in science education: Effects on student learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 190, 104621.
Grankina, E., et al. (2026). AI intelligent assistants in physics education: A framework for adaptive digital learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 55(1), 23–40.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Huang, R., et al. (2021). Virtual laboratories supported by artificial intelligence for collaborative STEM learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 2151–2172.
Indria, R., et al. (2025). Integrating 4C skills, HOTS, and TPACK in teacher professional development. Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 13(1), 55–68.
Karo, T., et al. (2025). The effectiveness of problem-based and discovery learning models in improving mathematics achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 18(2), 233–248.
Kim, J., et al. (2022). Adaptive AI systems in physics education: Enhancing critical thinking skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 107123.
Kitchenham, B., & Brereton, P. (2005). Software Engineering Aims and Research Questions. 1–58.
Larasati, D., et al. (2026). Innovative learning models in STEM education: A systematic review of problem-solving outcomes. Journal of Educational Research Review, 21, 100–115.
Lin, Y., et al. (2020). AI-based learning platforms and their impact on student creativity in STEM education. Computers & Education, 150, 103842.
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed. In Open Ideas at Pearson.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001
Putra, A., et al. (2025). Discovery learning integrated with STEAM: Effects on student achievement and self-efficacy. Journal of Science Learning, 9(1), 77–89.
Tsai, C. C., et al. (2021). AI-based feedback systems and their role in enhancing digital skills in science learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(6), 2245–2260.
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21 st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
Wang, X., et al. (2023). AI-powered virtual simulations in physics education: Effects on problem-solving skills. Computers & Education, 195, 104734.
Wayne Holmes, Maya Bialik, C. F. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Learning Education. 242.
Wicaksono, A., & Erlina, N. (2024). Virtual science teaching to improve creativity and conceptual understanding. Journal of Physics Education, 58(3), 301–312.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Indah Eka Wahyuningsih, Nadira Yasintha, Sintia Maharani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi (JPFT) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi (JPFT).
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Downloads
How to Cite
