Perbedaan Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD (Students Teams Achievement Division) dan Jigsaw Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah pada Pembelajaran Fisika

Authors

Ana Silfiani Rahmawati , Yasinta Embu Ika

DOI:

10.29303/jpft.v6i1.1661

Published:

2020-06-23

Issue:

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020): Januari-Juni

Keywords:

STAD, Jigsaw, and Problem Solving

Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Rahmawati, A. S., & Ika, Y. E. (2020). Perbedaan Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD (Students Teams Achievement Division) dan Jigsaw Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah pada Pembelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 6(1), 162–168. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v6i1.1661

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out: (1) whether there is an effectiveness of the STAD learning model for solving science problems (Physics); (2) is there an effectiveness of the Jigsaw learning model for problem solving in Natural Sciences (Physics); and (3) whether there is an effectiveness of the STAD and Jigsaw learning models in solving science (Physics) problems. This research is a quantitative study using quasi-experimental design. The research sample consisted of students in class VIIIa and VIIIb of SMP Negeri 2 Ende, while the object of this study was the influence of STAD learning, the influence of Jigsaw learning, and the problem-solving ability of students. Data collection is done through tests and observations. The research instrument consists of objective tests for problem solving skills. Data analysis using one sample test and different test. The results showed that the problem-solving ability of students at SMPN 2 Ende experienced differences between the three learning above. Can be seen in the total difference in the STAD method of 7552,000; for the Jigsaw 8438,000 method; and for the conventional model of 4405,000. This proves that the Jigsaw type cooperative model is more effective than the STAD type cooperative model and conventional learning model, while the STAD type cooperative model is more effective than conventional.

References

Abbas, M. L. H. (2019). Penerapan Pembelajaran Model Jigsaw Untuk Meningkatkan Minat Dan Hasil Belajar Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 5(2), 270ââ¬â277.

Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan validitas edisi 4. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Darnon, C., Buchs, C., & Desbar, D. (2012). The jigsaw technique and self-efficacy of vocational training students: A practice report. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(3), 439ââ¬â449.

Fachrurazi. (2011). Penerapan Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan UPI.

Goldston, M. J., & Downey, L. (2012). Your science classroom: Becoming an elementary/middle school science teacher. SAGE Publications.

Ibrahim, I., Kosim, K., & Gunawan, G. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Conceptual Understanding Procedures (CUPs) Berbantuan LKPD terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 3(1), 14ââ¬â23.

Juraini, J., Taufik, M., & Gunada, I. W. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD (Student Team Achievement Division) dengan Metode Eksperimen Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Hasil Belajar Fisika pada Siswa SMA Negeri 1 Labuapi Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 2(2), 80ââ¬â85.

Mardapi, D. (2008). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan non tes [Techniques for preparing test and non-test instruments]. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Mitra Cendikia.

McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in Education: Evidence-Based Inquiry, MyEducationLab Series. Pearson.

Slavin, R. E. (1991). Student team learning: A practical guide to cooperative learning. ERIC.

Suharsimi, A. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian : Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Widjajanti, D. B. (2009). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis mahasiswa calon guru matematika: apa dan bagaimana mengembangkannya. Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 5.

Author Biographies

Ana Silfiani Rahmawati, Universitas Flores

Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika (FKIP)

Universitas Floresà

Yasinta Embu Ika, Universitas Flores

Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika (FKIP)

Universitas Floresà

License

Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi (JPFT) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi (JPFT).
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.