Efektifitas Model Pembelajaran CCM-CCA Untuk Memfasilitasi Perubahan Konsep Gaya Pada Mahasiswa

Muh Makhrus, Wahono Widodo, Rudiana Agustini

Abstract


This study aims to examine the effectiveness of the CCM-CCA learning model that has been validated by physicist education through Focused Group Discussions (FGD) activities, and the validation results are valid in content and construct. The research design used follows the Education Research and Development method. The development of models starting from designing the model until implementing the model. Test the effectiveness of the model measured by the results of analysis of observational data and interview results on the occurrence of conceptual changes in students. Observation and interview data refers to the thought process experienced by students as a condition for conceptual change. The results of the study showed that students who were the subjects of the study experienced the four (4) thought processes that were the conditions for conceptual change. These results indicate that the CCM-CCA learning model is an effective learning model for facilitating the occurrence of student conceptual changes from wrong conceptions into scientific conceptions (physicist conception) about the concept of force

Keywords


Effectiveness; CCM-CCA learning model; concept change; force

Full Text:

PDF

References


Azizoglu, N. 2004. Conceptual Change Oriented Instruction And Students’ Misconceptions Ingases. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara,Turkey.

Baser, M. 2006. Fostering Conceptual Change By Cognitive Conflict Based Instruction On Students’ Understanding Of Heat Andtemperature Concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 2 (2), 96-14, July 2006.

Byun, T.& Lee, G. 2011. An Explanation For The Difficulty Of Leading Conceptual Change Using A Counterintuitive Demonstration: The Relationship Between Cognitive Conflict And Responses. Springer Science And Business Media B.V. 2011, Res Sci Educ DOI 10.1007/s11165-011-9234-5.

Cakir, M. 2008. Constructivist Approaches To Learning In Science And Their Implications For Science Pedagogy: A literature review.International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 3 (4), 193-206.

Demirciouglu, G., Ayas, A., &Demirciouglu, H. 2005. Conceptual Change Achieved Through A New Teaching Program On Acids And Bases. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6,36-51.

Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E., dan Hyun, H.H. 2012. How To Design And Evaluate Research In Education, 8th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Gall, M.D. & Borg. 2003. Educational Research. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Gottdenker, J. 2005. Model Building For Conceptional Change. Interactive Learning Environments. 13 (1-2), April–August, 2005, 15-37.

Lee, G., Kwon, J., Park, S., Kim, J., Kwon, H., & Park, H. 2003. Development of an instrument formeasuring cognitive conflict in secondary-level science classes. Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching, 40(6), 585–603.

Makhrus, M. 2013. Pemahaman mahasiswa tentang konsep gaya. Studi Pendahulun Tentang Model Perubahan Konseptual Dengan Pendekatan Konflik Kognitif Berbasis Pemahaman Mahasiswa Tentang Konsep Gaya: Surabaya.

Makhrus, M., Nur, M., & Widodo, W. 2014. Model Perubahan Konseptual dengan Pendekatan Konflik Kognitif. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, Vol.IX No.1, Maret: 20-25.

Makhrus, M. 2018. Validitas Model Pembelajaran Conceptual Change Model with Cognitive Conflict Approach. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, Vol.3 No.1, Mei: 62-66.

Pebriyanti, D., Sahidu, H., & Sutrio. 2015. Efektifitas Model Pembelajaran Perubahan Konseptual untuk Mengatasi Miskonsepsi Fisika pada Kelas X SMAN 1 Praya Barat Tahun Pelajaran 2012/2013. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 1(1), 92-96.

Posner, Strike, Hewson,& Gertzog. 1982. Accomodation of a scienific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change.Department of Education, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

Silung, S.N.W., Kusairi, S., & Zulaikah, S. 2016. Diagnosis Miskonsepsi Siswa SMA di Kota Malang pada Konsep Suhu dan Kalor Menggunakan Three Tier Test. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 2(3), 95-105.

Smith, J.P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. 1993. Misconception reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition.The Journal of the Learning Science,3, 115-163.

Tomita, M. K., 2008. Examining the influence of formative assessment on conceptual accumulation and conceptual change. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.

Tuqalby, R., Sutrio., dan Gunawan. 2017. Pengaruh Strategi Konflik Kognitif terhadap Penguasaan Konsep pada Materi Fluida Siswa SMAN 3 Mataram tahun ajaran 2016/2017. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi 3(1), 8-13.

Unal, S., Costu, B., & Ayas, A. 2010. Secondary school students’ misconceptions of covalent bonding. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7, 3-29.

Wirth, K.R. & Perkins, D. 2008. Learning to learn. Available from: http://www.macalester.edu/geology/wirth/CourseMaterials.html(version 16 September 2008).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v4i2.810

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.