Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Melalui Pembelajaran Interactive Demonstration Siswa Kelas X SMA pada Materi Kalor

Authors

Rismatul Azizah , Lia Yuliati , Eny Latifa

DOI:

10.29303/jpft.v2i2.289

Published:

2017-04-22

Issue:

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2016): April

Keywords:

interactive demonstration, problem solving ability

Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Azizah, R., Yuliati, L., & Latifa, E. (2017). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Melalui Pembelajaran Interactive Demonstration Siswa Kelas X SMA pada Materi Kalor. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 2(2), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v2i2.289

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

The application of teacher centered learning in classroom is causing the underdevelopment of students problem solving ability and students activity in learning. Interactive demonstration is an active learning model developed by Wenning. Through interactive demonstrations, students can use the basic intellectual process skills that includes predicting, explaining, estimating, acquiring and processing data, formulating and revising scientific explanations using logic and evidence, and recognizing and analyzing alterative xplanations and models. The purpose of this research is to determine the effect of interactive learning demonstration toward students' problem solving ability. This research was mixed method research with embedded design. The sample is selected by purposive sampling method, that was the grade X MIA 1 students of SMAN 1 Bangil. The results of this study indicate that there is the effect of interactive demonstration learning and that learning can enhance students' problem-solving abilities.

References

National Research Council. 1996. National Science Education Standard. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

Mims, Clif. 2003. Authentic Learning: A Practical Introduction & Guide for Implementation. A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal, vol 6, Issue 1, Winter 2003, ISSN 10979778.

Hoellwarth, C., Moelter, M. J., & Knight, R. D. A. 2005. Direct Comparison of Conceptual Learning and Problem Solving Ability in Traditional and Studio Style Classrooms. American Journal of Physics, vol. 73, 459.

Walsh.L, N. Howard R.G, and Bowe. B., 2007. Phenomenography Study of Studentsââ¬â¢ Problem Solving Approach in Physics. Physics Education Research, vol. 1, 12.

Brad. A., 2011. A Study of The Problem Solving Activity in High School Student: Strategies and Self-Regulated Learning. Acta Didactica Napocensia, vol. 21, 30.

Ogunleye. A. O., 2009. Teacher and Student Perception of Student Problem Solving Difficulties in Physics: Implication for

Remidion. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, vol. 85, 90.

Ikhwanuddin, Jaedun. A. and Purwantoro, 2010. D, Problem Solving dalam Pembelajaran Fisika untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Mahasiswa Berpikir Analitis. Jurnal Kependidikan. vol. 14, 16.

Wilhelm. J, Thacker. B, and Wilhelm. R. ,Creating Constructivist Physics for Introductory University Classes. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 2007.

Wenning, Carl. J. 2012. Levels of Inquiry: Using Inquiry Spectrum Learning Sequences to Teach Science. J. Phys. Tchr. Educ. Online, 5(3).

Violeta, S dan Loreta, R., 2010, ââ¬ÅThe Learning Physics Impact of Interactive Lecture Demonstrationââ¬Â, Problems of Education in the 21th Century, 24, 120-129.

Wenning, Carl J. 2011. The Levels of Inquiry Model of Science Teaching. J. Phys. Tchr. Educ. Online, 6(2).

Wenning, Carl. J. 2010. Levels of Inquiry Model of Science Teaching: Learning sequences to lesson plans. J. Phys. Tchr. Educ. Online, 5(3).

Selcuk. G. S, Caliskan. S, Erol. M, The Effect of Problem Solving Instruction on Physics Achievement, Problem Solving Performance and Strategy Use. Latin America Journal Physics Education. (Online). 2(3) 2008, pp151- 166.

Gok. T, Silay. I, Effect of Problem Solving Strategy Teaching on the Problem Solving Attitude of Cooperating Learning Group in Physics Education. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 2008.

Gok. T, Silay. I, The Effects of Problem Solving Strategies on Studentsââ¬â¢ Achievement, Attitude and Motivation. LatinAmerican Journal of Physics Education, 4(1) 2010, pp 7-21.

Santrock, J.W. 2011. Educational Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Chi, M. T. H., & Glaser, R. (1985). Problem-solving ability. Dalam R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human abilities: An information-processing approach (227ââ¬â250). New York: Freeman.

De Cock, M. 2012. Representation Use and Strategy Choice in Physics Problem Solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research.

Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. 1981. Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. 5:121-152.

Singh, C. 2008a. Assessing Student Expertise in Introductory Physics with Isomorphic Problems. I. Performance on Nonintuitive Problem Pair From Introductory. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research.

Singh, C. 2008b. Assessing Student Expertise in Introductory Physics with Isomorphic Problems. II. Effect of Some Potential Factors on Problem Solving and Transfer. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research.

Mason, A. & Singh, C. 2011. Assessing Expertise in Introductory Physics Using Categorization Task. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research.

Shih, Y.L. & Singh, C. 2013. Using an isomorphic

problem pair to learn introductory physics: Transferring from a two-step problem to a three-step problem. Physical Review Special

Topics - Physics Education Research.

Savelsbergh, E. R., de Jong, T., & Ferguson-Hessler, M.G.M. 2011. Choosing The Right Solution Approach: The Crucial Role Of Situational Knowledge in Electricity and Magnetism. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research

Costa, A.L.1985. Developing Minds. Alexandria, Virginia : ASCD

Creswell. John W,Vicki L. Plano Clark. Designing and conducting Mixed Methods Research. London: Sage Publications. 2008.

Rusilowati. A, Profil Kesulitan Belajar Fisik Bahasan Kelistrikan Siswa SMA di Kota Semarang. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia. Vol. 4 No. 2, 2006.

Stice. J.E. Teaching Problem Solving [Online].

Tersedia:http://wwwcsi.unian.it/educa/problemsolving/stice_ps.html

Muyassaroh, Indana Zulfa. 2015. Pengaruh Level of Inquiry terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika Pesrta Didik Kelas X SMA. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Negeri Malang.

Santyasa. (2007). Pengembangan Pemahaman Konsep Dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika Bagi Siswa SMA Dengan Pemberdayaan Model Perubahan Konseptual Berseting Investigasi Kelompok. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.

License

Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi (JPFT) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi (JPFT).
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.