Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Fisika Dasar Berbasis Model Pembelajaran P3e Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Program Studi Tadris Fisika

Authors

Bahtiar Bahtiar

DOI:

10.29303/jpft.v4i2.780

Published:

2018-11-02

Issue:

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018): Juli-Desember 2018

Keywords:

development of learning materials, Learning Model P3E, critical thinking skills

Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Bahtiar, B. (2018). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Fisika Dasar Berbasis Model Pembelajaran P3e Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Program Studi Tadris Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 4(2), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v4i2.780

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This research aims to cultivate our learning materials basic physics-based model of learning P3E to enhance students ' critical thinking skills. This research was carried out from June until October 2017 at UIN Mataram. The type of research used IE research development-oriented product development includes three phases, namely the preliminary studies, product development and testing products. Test your basic physics materials involving 36 students (two class) semester 2 academic year2016/2017 and extensive trials carried out on 49 students (two class) academic year 2017/2018 Prodi Tadris Physics FTK UIN Mataram. Products resulting from this research is a physics-based model of learning materials learning P3E consisting of four (4) syntax: organizing, investigation, evaluation, and presentation. Basic physics, materials physics material contain basic 1 sub staple in temperature and heat. The results of validation experts show all materials declared valid and reliability. Basic physics-based learning materials learning model used and effective practical P3E to enhance critical thinking skills. There for learning materials based models developed viable P3E learning used to enhance students ' critical thinking skills.

à



References

Akinyemi, O.A., & Folashade, A., 2010. Analysis of Science Process Skill in West Africa Senior Secondary School Certificate Physics Practical Examination in Nigeria. America-Eurasian Journal of Scientific Reseacch 5 (4), 234-240.

Anderson, L. D., Dan Krathwohl, D. R. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, And Assesing. Newyork. Addison Wesley Inc.

Arends, R. 2012. Learning to Teach, 9th Edition. New York: Mc-Graw Hill.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Bahtiar. 2016. Laporan Preliminary Study Di Prodi Pendidikan Fisika Ftk Uin Mataram. Mataram: NTB.

Blosser, Patricia E. & Helgenson, Stanley L. 1990. Selecting Procedures for Improving the Science Curriculum. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environment Education. (ED325303).

BSNP, T. 2006. Standar Isi. Jakarta. Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan

Carin, A. A. 1993. Teaching Modern Science. Sixth Edition. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Chaguna, L.L & Yango, D.M. 2008. Science Process Skills Proficiency of the Grade VI Pupils in The Elementary Diocesan Schools of Baguio and Benguet. Research Journal. 16(4): 22-32.

Depdiknas. 2008. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar dan Media. Jakarta: Dikmenum Depdiknas.

Eggen Paul dan Kaucahak Don. 2012. Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran: Mengajar Konten dan Keterampilan Berpikir, Edisi 6 (Terjemahan) Jakarta: PT. Indeks.

Ekene, Igboegwu. 2011. Effects of Co-Operative Learning Strategy and Demonstration Method On Acquisition of Science Process Skills by Chemistry Students of Different Levels of Scientific Literacy. Journal of research and Development. 3(1): 204-212.

Ergazaki, M. 2000. Biotechnology/Genetic Engineering: Research on Teaching and Learning in Critical Thinking Context. http://www.iubs.org/patras.biotech-criticalthinking.pdf. Diakses tanggal pada 18 Desember 2015.

Facione, P. 2013. Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Measured Reasons and The California Academic Press, Millbrae, CA.

Haryono. 2006. Model Pembelajaran Berbasis peningkatan Keterampilan Proses Sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar. 7 (1), (1-13)

Hassard, J. 2005. The Art Teaching Science. New York: Oxford University Press.

Jack, G.U. 2013. The Influence of Identified Student and School Variables on Student Science Process Skill Acquisition. Journal of Education and Practice. 4(5): 16-22.

Joseph. 2006. Partnership for 21st Century Skills (P21). Are They Really Ready to Work? The Conference Board, Corporate Voices for Working Families, P21, and SHRM.

Karamustafaoglu. 2011. Improving the Science Process Skill Ability of Science Student Teacher Using I Diagram. Eurasia Journal of Physics and Chemistry Educational, 26-36.

Nurmayani, L., Doyan, A., & Verawati, N. N. S. P. 2018. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 4(1), 98-104.

Liliasari. 2009. Berpikir Kritis Dalam Pembelajaran Sains Kimia Menuju Profesionalitas Guru. Bandung: Program Studi Pendidikan IPA Sekolah Pascasarjana UPI.

Martin, D. 2011. Introduction to The Special Issue On Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Higher Education Reseach and Development, 255-260.

Nur. 2008. Pengajaran Berpusat Kepada Siswa dan Pendekatan Konstruktivis dalam Pengajaran. Surabaya: PSMS UNESA.

Ratumanan, T. G. & Laurens. 2006. Evaluasi Hasil Belajar Yang Relevan Dengan Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.

Schafersman, S. D. 1991. Introduction to Critical Thinking. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.freeinquiry.com/critical-thinking.html. Diakses pada tanggal 12 November 2012.

Snyder, L G., & Snyder M J. 2008. Teaching Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Skills. Spring/Summer, L (2).

Yeritia, S., Wahyudi, & Rahayu, S. 2017. Pengaruh model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing terhadap penguasaan konsep dan kemampuan berpikir kritis fisika peserta didik kelas X SMAN 1 Kuripan tahun ajaran 2017/2018. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 3(2), 181-187.

Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukarno, Permanasari, A., & Hamidah, I. 2013. The Profile of Science Process Skill (SPS) Student at Secondary High School (Case Study in Jambi). International Journal of Scientific Enginering and Research. 1(1): 79-83.

Peter, E E. 2012. Critical Thinking: Essence for Teachiing Mathematics and Mathematics Problem Solving Skill. African Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science Research, 5(3): 39-43. doi: 10.5897/AJMCSR11.161.

Pomahac, G., Thelma M. Gunn, Lance M. Grigget. 2007. Bioethics and Critical Thinking in a Science Classroom. Conference Prisiding. http://www.umanitoba.ca/confer-guy.1438.pdf. Diakses pada tanggal 18 Desember 2015.

Oktaviani, W., Gunawan, & Sutrio. 2017. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Fisika Kontekstual Untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 3(1), 1-7.

Author Biography

Bahtiar Bahtiar, Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Tadris Fisika

License

Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi (JPFT) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi (JPFT).
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.