Evaluasi Program Musyawarah Guru Mata Pelajaran Fisika SMA di Kabupaten Pangkep
DOI:
10.29303/jpft.v6i1.1827Published:
2020-05-16Issue:
Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020): Januari-JuniKeywords:
Evaluation, Programs, MGMP, Physics, models, Countenance StakeArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
The teacher as an important figure in learning to encourage students to achieve high learning outcomes. In carrying out their activities, teachers who are members of the Physics Consultative Association (MGMP) of Physics in Pangkep Regency need to be evaluated. This research aims to plan the preparation, implementation and results of the Physics MGMP program in Pangkep Regency. To achieve these objectives, evaluative research has been conducted using the Countenance Stakeââ¬â¢s model. The subject of this research was the High School Physics Teacher Study Program (MGMP) in Pangkep Regency. Data collection uses interviews, observation, and documentation. Data were analyzed using the qualitative model of Miles and Huberman. Data analysis consists of three activities: data condensation, data display and conclusions. The results of data analysis that prove the evaluation of preparation is in accordance with the guidelines used. Implementation evaluation is in accordance with the guidelines used, but it needs to be on several aspects. Program evaluation of MGMP results depends on either category. Based on the evaluation findings of this program, it can be recommended that the MGMP program in Pangkep Regency can be continued with several improvements. So that the preparation is more optimal. While on the implementation schedule, active participants need to be optimized, and need an agenda related to the needs of teachers in the field.
References
Adiningsih, S., (2017). Daya Saing SDM Indonesia, http://wantimpres.go.id/? p=1509&lang=id (diakses 8 April 2020).
Data Pokok Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, https://dapo.dikdasmen.kemdikbud.go.id/guru/1/190000, diakses pada tanggal 4 Mei 2020.
Depdiknas. (2009). Prosedur Operasional Standar Penyelenggaraan KKG MGMP.Direktorat Jenderal Peningkatan Mutu Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan.
Hasyim, M., (2015). Efektifitas Musyawarah Guru Mata Pelajaran (MGMP) Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam, Jurnal Pusaka, 2 (2). Januari ââ¬â Juni 2015 : 30-43.
Koballa & Chiapetta. (2010). Science Instruction in the Middle and Secondary Schools.Pearson: USA.
Mahmud, (2015). Ilmu Pendidikan. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M., (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.
Onate, M. E., & Loekmono, J. T. L., (2016). Evaluasi Program Musyawarah Guru Bimbingan dan Konseling SMP/MTs Kota Salatiga Tahun 2012 ââ¬â 2015. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan FKIP Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Volume: 3, No. 2, Juli-Desember 2016 : 294-309.
Pratiwi, I., (2019). Efek Program Pisa Terhadap Kurikulum Di Indonesia, Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Vol. 4, Nomor 1, Juni 2019, 51-71. DOI : 10.24832/jpnk.V4i1.1157.
Purwanto, N., (2012). Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sani, R. A., Arafah, K., Aziz, I., Tanjung, R., & Suswanto, H., (2020). Evaluasi Proses dan Penilaian Hasil Belajar, Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. ISBN 978-602-446-430-1.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Sinkfield, A. J., (2007). Evaluatoin Theory, Models & Applications. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sund, R. B., & Trowbridge, L. A. W. (1973). Teaching Science by Inquiry in the Secondary School Second Edition. United State of America: Charles E. Merill Publishing Company A Bell & Howell Company.
Sutrisno, B., (2014). MGMP : Inovasi Pendidikan, http://mgmpkwugunkid. blogspot.com/2014/01/manfaat-mgm p-bagi-guru.html, diakses tanggal 4 Mei 2020.
Suyanto & Jihad, A., (2013). Menjadi guru profesional "Strategi Meningkatkan kualifikasi dan kualitas guru di era global".Jakarta : Erlangga
Tyler, R. W, (1950). Basic Principles Curriculum and Instruction, Syillabus for Education, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 Tentang Guru dan Dosen. Jakarta : Kementrian Pendidikan Nasional
Wisudawati, A. W., & Sulistyowati, E., (2014). Metodologi Pembelajaran IPA. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Yasri, (2016). Konsep Pengembangan MGMP Bagi Widyaiswara. Jakarta : Badan Litbang dan Diklat Kementerian Agama.
Author Biographies
Kaharuddin Arafah, Jurusan Fisika, Universitas Negeri Makassar
Muamar Qadar, Program Magister Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Makassar
Triyanto Pristiwaluyo, Program Magister Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Makassar
License
Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi (JPFT) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi (JPFT).
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
