Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): July-December
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

Development of Assessments to Measure Students' Science Literacy Ability: Rasch Modeling Analysis

Authors

Ocha Andaresta , Muliani Muliani , Safriana Safriana , Halimatus Sakdiah , Nanda Novita

DOI:

10.29303/jpft.v9i2.6092

Published:

2023-12-20

Downloads

Abstract

Science literacy is a demand for education in the 21st century. The ability of science literacy in Indonesia is relatively low because the questions used are not based on scientific literacy. This research aims to produce assessment products that are suitable for use, then find out the responses of teachers and students, and find out the science literacy ability of students. The method in this research is Research and development (R&D) using the Borg & Gall development model to the eighth stage. The results obtained in this study are: (1) Product feasibility results based on material experts by 78% and declared feasible, then on media experts by 87.49% and declared possible. Then, the results of the validity of question items are displayed as suitable for use with a total of 20 valid questions, item reliability 0.90 (excellent). (2) The teacher's response result of 93.5% is excellent. Then, the response of students of 88.13% was excellent. (3) The lowest science literacy ability of students is in science as a way to conduct investigations, which is 34.50%, and the highest in science as a stem of science at 72.50%.

Keywords:

Assessment Science Literacy Rasch Model

References

Adawiyah, R., & Wisudawati, A. W. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Berbasis Literasi Sains : Menilai Pemahaman Fenomena Ilmiah Mengenai Energi. Indonesian Journal of Curriculum, 5(2), 112–121.

Chasanah, N., Widodo, W., & Suprapto, N. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Literasi Sains Untuk Mendeskripsikan Profil Peserta Didik. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 474–483. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.2.474-483

Depdiknas. (2003). Undang-undang RI Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Fuadi, H., Robbia, A. Z., Jamaluddin, J., & Jufri, A. W. (2020). Analisis Faktor Penyebab Rendahnya Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 5(2), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v5i2.122

Irvika, A. A. J., Nurhayati, & Hadis, A. (2021). Analisis Kebutuhan Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Autentik Berbasis Literasi Literasi Sains Peserta Didik Kelas X. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Biologi VI, 78–84.

Kemendikbud. (2020). AKM dan Implikasinya pada Pembelajaran.

Kerwin. (2015). The Impact of Web 2.0 in Education and its Potensial for Language Learning and Teaching. Innovations in Teaching & Learning Conference Proceedings, 5. https://doi.org/10.13021/g8060p

Mardhiyyah, L. A., Rusilowati, A., & Linuwih, S. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Literasi Sains Tema Energi. 5(2), 147–154.

Marhami, Lukman, I. R., & Muliani. (2020). Pengantar Literasi Sains Dan Numerasi.

Muliaman, A., Sakdiah, H., Wahdi Ginting, F., Sabrin, N., & Zahara. (2022). Analisis Employability Skill Dan Literasi Sains Siswa Melalui Authentic Self-Assessment Pada Kurikulum Merdeka Di Sma Aceh Utara. JPF (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika) Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, 11(1), 24–32.

Muliani, M., Novita, N., Mellyzar, M., Pasaribu, A. I., & Fadli, M. R. (2022). Analysis of the Characteristics of the Ethnoscience-Based Numeracy Test Instrument Using the Rasch Model. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(5), 2176–2183. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.2285

OECD. (2018). Combined Executive Summaries. PISA 2009 at a Glance, I. https://doi.org/10.1787/g222d18af-en

PISA. (2018). What Student Know and Can Do: Vol. I. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en

Putri, R. K. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Literasi Sains Siswa Pada Topik Keanekaragaman Makhluk Hidup. Diklabio: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Biologi, 4(1), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.33369/diklabio.4.1.71-78

Rusilowati, A. (2018). Asesmen Literasi Sains: Analisis Karakteristik Instrumen dan Kemampuan Siswa Menggunakan Teori Tes Modern Rasch Model. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika Universitas Riau Ke-3, September, 2–15. https://snf.fmipa.unri.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/0.-300B-2-15NI.pdf

Sa'adah, R, N., & Wahyu. (2020). Metode Penelitian R&D. Bandung: Literasi Nusantara

Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006). The use of scientific literacy taxonomy for assessing the development of chemical literacy among high-school students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(4), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90011A

Sumaryatun, Rusilowati, A., & Eko Nugrohu, S. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Autentik Kurikulum 2013 Berbasis Literasi Sains Pada Materi Bioteknologi. 5(1), 66–73.

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch Pada Assessment Pendidikan. Bandung: Trim Komika

Suwandi, S. (2020). Pengembangan Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Daring Nasional: Pengembangan Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar , 2001, 1–12. https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/semiba/issue/view/956/Tersediadi:https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/semiba/issue/view/956/

Toharudin, U., Hendrawati, S., & Rustaman, A. (2011). Membangun Literasi Sains Peserta Didik. Bandung: Humaniora.

Yuliati, Y. (2017). Literasi Sains dalam Pembelajaran IPA. Prosiding SNFA (Seminar Nasional Fisika Dan Aplikasinya), 2(2), 257. https://doi.org/10.20961/prosidingsnfa.v2i0.16408

Author Biographies

Ocha Andaresta, Universitas Malikussaleh

Author Origin : Indonesia

Muliani Muliani, Malikussaleh University

Author Origin : Indonesia

Physics Education Study Program

Safriana Safriana, Universitas Malikussaleh

Author Origin : Indonesia

Halimatus Sakdiah, Universitas Malikussaleh

Author Origin : Indonesia

Nanda Novita, Universitas Malikussaleh

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Andaresta, O., Muliani, M., Safriana, S., Sakdiah, H., & Novita, N. (2023). Development of Assessments to Measure Students’ Science Literacy Ability: Rasch Modeling Analysis . Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 9(2), 356–365. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v9i2.6092