Effect of the Guided Inquiry Model with Deep Learning Approach on Student Learning Outcomes on Elements and Compounds Material
DOI:
10.29303/jpm.v21i5.12033Published:
2026-09-28Downloads
Abstract
The 21st-century education requires students to develop critical thinking skills and achieve a deep conceptual understanding. Furthermore, studies integrating the guided inquiry learning model with a deep learning approach in junior high school science education remain limited. Therefore, this study aims to determine the impact and effectiveness of a guided inquiry learning model, integrated with a deep learning approach, on student learning outcomes on the topic of elements and compounds. The study employed a quantitative quasi-experimental design with a nonequivalent control group. The sample consisted of two classes, Class VIII-T1 (experimental group) and Class VIII-T4 (control group), each comprising 32 students. The research instrument was a cognitive learning outcome test consisting of 30 multiple-choice questions administered as both a pretest and a posttest. Data were analyzed using normality and homogeneity tests, an independent sample t-test, and Normalized Gain (N-Gain) analysis with the aid of SPSS version 21. The results showed that the average pretest score for the experimental group rose from 40.5 to 80.9, while the control group increased from 34.8 to 72.3. The independent sample t-test yielded a significance value (2-tailed) of 0.000 (< 0.05), indicating a significant difference between the two groups. Additionally, the N-Gain score for the experimental group was 0.71 (high category), whereas the control group achieved 0.61 (medium category). The novelty of this study lies in integrating the guided inquiry learning model with the principles of mindful, meaningful, and enjoyable learning, enabling students to construct scientific concepts in a more active, reflective, and meaningful manner. These findings indicate that integrating guided inquiry with a deep learning approach can be an innovative strategy to enhance students' conceptual understanding and learning outcomes in science, particularly in the area of elements and compounds.
Keywords:
Deep Learning Elements and Compounds Guided Inquiry Learning OutcomesReferences
[1] S. Luhut, N. Barokah, and R. Kamal, “Pembelajaran Kontekstual sebagai Inovasi Kreatif dalam MenjadikanMateri Ajar Lebih Bermakna”, JISPENDIORA : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Pendidikan dan Humaniora, vol. , no. 2, pp. 94-103, 2025. 10.56910/jispendiora.v4i2.2197.
[2] A. P. Jufri, W. K. Asri, M. Mannahali, and A. Vidya, Strategi Pembelajaran: Menggali Potensi Belajar Melalui Model, Pendekatan, dan Metode yang Efektif. Yogyakarta: Ananta Vidya, 2023.
[3] A. Nuai and S. Nurkamiden, “Urgensi kegiatan praktikum dalam pembelajaran ilmu pengetahuan alam di sekolah dasar dan menengah,” SEARCH: Science Education Research Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 48–63, 2022, doi: 10.12345/search.v1i1.9012.
[4] D. Alighiri, A. Drastisianti, and E. Susilaningsih, “Pemahaman konsep siswa materi larutan penyangga dalam pembelajaran multiple representasi,” Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 2192–2200, 2018, doi: 0.15294/jipk.v12i2.15735.
[5] Z. C. Alfany and A. R. Purnomo, “Penerapan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik pada materi sistem pernapasan manusia,” PENSA: E-Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 250–255, 2023, doi: 10.26740/pensa.v11i3.55745.
[6] Depin, H. Nurwahid, F. Y. Sulla, and Y. Barella, “Inquiry learning: Pengertian, sintaks dan contoh implementasi di kelas,” Indonesian Journal on Education and Learning, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 39–43, 2024, doi.org/https://journal.myrepublikcorp. com/index.php/IJEN/article/view/80.
[7] V. B. Kovač, D. Ø. Nome, A. R. Jensen, and L. L. Skreland, “The why, what and how of deep learning: Critical analysis and additional concerns,” Education Inquiry, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 237–253, 2025, doi: 10.1080/20004508.2023.2194502.
[8] I. Fatmawati, “Transformasi pembelajaran sejarah dengan deep learning berbasis digital untuk Gen Z,” Revorma: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemikiran, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 25–39, 2025, doi: 10.62825/revorma.v5i1.140.
[9] A. Riandeni, D. Yulianti, and W. Distrik, “Pengembangan instrumen penilaian kognitif berbasis student active learning untuk meningkatkan critical thinking peserta didik sekolah dasar,” Jurnal Basicedu, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 4720–4730, 2022, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2868.
[10] D. Rosyidi, “Teknik dan instrumen asesmen ranah kognitif,” Jurnal Tarbiyah Syari’ah-Islamiyah, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2020, doi: 10.52166/tasyri.v27i1.79.
[11] Rusman, Model-Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2011.
[12] I. K. S. Adnyana, “Implementasi pendekatan deep learning dalam pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia,” Retorika: Jurnal Pembelajaran Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2024, doi: 10.37478/rjpbsi.v5i2.5304.
[13] D. B. Ahyar et al., Model-Model Pembelajaran. Pradina Pustaka, 2021.
[14] N. M. Yasmini, “Metode inkuiri terbimbing untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar IPA peserta didik kelas V,” Journal of Education Action Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 73–80, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jear.v6i1.44013.
[15] Sukardi, Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara, 2011.
[16] S. Arikunto, Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2016.
[17] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2019.
[18] Priyatno, Analisis Data dengan SPSS. Jakarta: Media Kom, 2013.
[19] R. R. Hake, Analyzing Change/Gain Score. Indiana: Indiana University, 1999.
[20] N. K. Susmariani, I. W. Widana, and I. N. R. Adi, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing berbasis blended learning dan kemandirian belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa sekolah dasar,” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Citra Bakti, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 230–239, 2022, doi: 10.38048/jipcb.v9i1.675.
[21] N. M. B. Mulyanti, I. K. Gading, and Diki, “Dampak penerapan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing terhadap hasil belajar IPA dan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa,” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Profesi Guru, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 109–119, 2023, doi: 10.23887/jippg.v6i1.59276.
[22] Y. Shandra and M. A. Movitaria, “Penerapan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa,” Jurnal Basicedu, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 692–699, 2022, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v6i1.2006.
[23] S. Wahid, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing terhadap hasil belajar fisika ditinjau dari minat belajar peserta didik kelas XI SMAN 9 Makassar,” Jurnal Ilmiah Ecosystem, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 774–785, 2023, doi: 10.35965/eco.v23i3.3905.
[24] J. R. Herung, D. W. Kamagi, and M. L. Taulu, “Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa melalui model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing pada materi keanekaragaman hayati,” Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 4836–4846, 2025, doi: 10.31004/jerkin.v3i4.1352.
[25] J. Widodo et al., “Does the guided inquiry model improve student's problem solving thinking ability? Meta-analysis,” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, vol. 9, special issue, pp. 37–45, 2023, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v9iSpecialIssue.6253.
[26] B. Joyce and M. Weil, Models of Teaching (Model-Model Pengajaran). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2009.
[27] A. P. Jufri, W. K. Asri, M. Mannahali, and A. Vidya, Strategi Pembelajaran: Menggali Potensi Belajar Melalui Model, Pendekatan, dan Metode yang Efektif. Yogyakarta: Ananta Vidya, 2023.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Atika Fahruna Hasibuan, Ahmad Shafwan S. Pulungan, Sarwono Hadi Sahputra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).





