Feasibility of Four-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test for Identification Conception on Chemical Equilibrium Concept
DOI:
10.29303/cep.v7i1.6633Published:
2024-05-31Issue:
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Edisi Mei 2024Keywords:
feasibility, four-tier multiple choice, conceptionArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to obtain the feasibility of a four-tier multiple choice (4TMC) diagnostic test instrument for the identification of conceptions on chemical equilibrium material in terms of validity, practicality, and effectiveness criteria. This type of research is ADDIE development research with the Analyze, Design, Development, and Evaluation stages. Validity is obtained from a validation sheet consisting of construct, content, and language validity which gets mode = 4, so that the four-tier multiple choice instrument is said to be valid. Practicality is obtained from a learner response questionnaire supported by a learner activity observation sheet. Practicality in terms of the student's response questionnaire is 84% with a very practical category, while the student activity observation sheet gets mode = 1, so the diagnostic test instrument is said to be practical. Effectiveness is obtained from the diagnostic test instrument reliability test. The Cronbach alpha value obtained in the reliability test was 0.798, so the diagnostic test instrument developed was declared reliable. Based on the results of validity, practicality, and effectiveness, the four-tier multiple choice diagnostic test instrument is declared suitable for use.
References
Agustin, Utami., Endang, Sulasiningsih., Sri Nurhayati., & Nanik Wijayanti. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Four Tier Multiple Choice Untuk Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia. Journal of Chemistry In Education, 11(1).
Bernal-Ballen, A., & Ladino-Ospina, Y. (2019). Assessment: A suggested strategy for learning chemical equilibrium. Education Sciences, 9(3).
Fariyani, Qitshi., Ani, Rusilowati., & Sugianto. (2015). Pengembangan Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Untuk Mengungkap Miskonsepsi Fisika Siswa SMA Kelas X. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 4(2).
Fitri, N.S., Samsuddin, A., & Nugraha, M.G. (2017). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi dan Penyebab Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Four-Tier Diagnostic Test pada SubMateri Fluida Dinamik: Azas Kontinuitas. Jurnal Fisika Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 3(2), 175-180.
Ilham, I.P.P., & Novita, D. (2020). Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Four-Tier Multiple Choice (4TMC) pada Konsep Laju Reaksi. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, 9(2), 222-227.
Izzah, Nurul & Madlazim. (2019). Development Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Instruments On Newton's Law Of Gravitation Concept. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 8(2), 552-555.
Lutfi, Achmad. (2021. Research and Development (R&D): Implikasi dalam Pendidikan Kimia. Jurusan Kimia FMIPA Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Nofrion. (2016). Komunikasi Pendidikan: Penerapan Teori dan Konsep Komunikasi dalam Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana.
Nurulwati, A. Rahmadani. (2019). Perbandingan Hasil Diagnostik Miskonsepsi Menggunakan Three Tier Dan Four Tier Diagnostic Test Pada Materi Gerak Lurus. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 7(2), 101-110.
Perwitasari, A.D. (2015). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Berbasis Web pada Materi Termodinamika untuk Mengidentifikasi Tingkat Pemahaman Konsep Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 2(1).
Pujayanto., Budiharti, R., Radiyono, Y., Nuraini, N.R.A., Putri, H.V., Saputro, D.E., & Adhitama, E. (2018.) Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Miskonsepsi 4 Tahap materi Kinematika. Cakrawala Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 37(2), 238-249.
Riduwan. 2015. Dasar-Dasar Statistika. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Ristianti, Dina.,& Irwan, Fathurrochman. (2020). Penilaian Konseling Kelompok. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Rusilowati, A. (2015). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Sebagai Alat Evaluasi Kesulitan Belajar Fisika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika Dan Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2), 2-7.
Rusman. (2017). Belajar dan Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Savira, Intan., et al. (2019). Desain Instrumen Tes Three Tiers Multiple Choice Untuk Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Terkait Larutan Penyangga. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 13(1), 2277-2286.
Singarimbun, M., & Efendi. (1995). Metode Penelitian Survey. Jakarta: PT. Pustaka LP3ES.
Sujarweni, Wiratna. 2014. Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press.
Tegeh, I.M., Jampel, I.N. and Pudjawan, K., 2015. Pengembangan buku ajar model penelitian pengembangan dengan model ADDIE. In Seminar Nasional Riset Inovatif, 4(208), 208-216.
Treagust, D., & Tsui, Chi-Yan. 2010. Evaluating Secondary Student’s Scientific Reasoning in Genetics Using a Two-Tier diagnostic Instrument. International Jurnal of Science Education, 32(8),1073-1098.
Utari, Juli I & Ermawati, Frida U. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Miskonsepsi Berformat Four-Tier untuk Materi Suhu, Kalor dan Perpindahannya. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 7(3), 434-499.
Van Den Berg, Euwe. (1991). Miskonsepsi Fisika dan Remediasi. Salatiga: Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.
Winarni, Sri., & Syahrial. (2016). Miskonsepsi Kimia yang Disebabkan Pernyataan Nonproposisi. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 4(4), 122–12
Author Biographies
Reta Nareswari Rachmadhaniar, Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Dian Novita, Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia, Universitas Negeri Surabaya
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Reta Nareswari Rachmadhaniar, Dian Novita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Chemistry Education Practice agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Chemistry Education Practice.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
