Analisis Tingkat Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Getaran Harmonis Melalui Model Pembelajaran Perubahan Konseptual

Authors

Siti Zaenab , Muh. Makhrus , I Wayan Gunada

DOI:

10.29303/jpft.v5i1.813

Published:

2019-05-13

Issue:

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): Januari - Juni

Keywords:

Conceptual Change, Problem Solving Ability

Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Zaenab, S., Makhrus, M., & Gunada, I. W. (2019). Analisis Tingkat Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Getaran Harmonis Melalui Model Pembelajaran Perubahan Konseptual. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 5(1), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v5i1.813

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

The study aims to analyze the problem-solving ability (PSA) of students during the learning process with conceptual change learning model. This research is included in quantitative descriptive research with three experimental classes. PSA at the time of learning is measured by an assessment instrument that refers to the problems in the LKPD and PSA evaluation sheet which contains two description questions at every meeting for four meetings. The assessment instrument refers to four PSA indicators, namely the ability to understand problems, plan solutions, carry out problem-solving, and check again, which is done during the learning process. Data analysis of PSA research results based on LKPD found that 58% of students have PSA in the very good category and 42% in the good category, while based on the evaluation results at each meeting it was found that 27% in the very good category, 62% in the good category, and 11% in the medium category. Analysis of research data shows that the conceptual change learning model is good to improve the problem-solving ability of harmonic motion of students of SMAN 8 Mataram.

References

Adolphus, T., Alamina, J., & Aderonmu, T. 2013. The Effectsof Collaborative Learning on Problem Solving Abilities among Senior Secondary School Physics Students in Simple Harmonis Motion. Journal Education and Practice, 3(25),95-100.

Al-Tabany, T. I. B. 2014. Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Terpadu Inovatif, Progresif, dan Kontekstual: Konsep, Landasan, dan Implementasinya pada Kurikulum 2013 (Kurikulum Tematik Integratif/TKI). Prenada Media Group: Jakarta.

Aydin, S. 2012. Remediation of Misconceptions about Geometric Optics Using Conceptual Change Texts. Journal of Education Research and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 001-012.

Azizah, R., Yuliati, Y., & Latifah, E. 2016. Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Melalui Pembelajaran Interactive Demonstration Peserta didik Kelas X SMA pada Materi Kalor. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 2(2), 55-59.

Baser, M. 2006. Fostering Conceptual Change by Cognitive Conflict Based Instruction On Studentsââ¬â¢ Understanding Of Heat and Temperature Concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(2), 96-114.

Cakir, O. S., Gebans, O., & Yuruk, N. 2002. Effectiveness Conceptual Change Text-Oriented Instruction on Students Understanding Of Cellular Respiration Concepts. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 30, 239-243.

Denis, U. A. Williams, J. J., Dunnamah, A. Y., & Tumba, D. P. 2015. Conceptual Change Theory as a Teaching Strategy in Environmental Education. European Scientific Journal, 11(35), 395-408.

Driver, R. 1988. Changing Conceptions.www.cdbeta.uu.nl/tdb/fulltext/Tdbeta_6_2_Driver_1988.pdf, diakses tanggal 6 Januari 2018.

Eka, P. I. W., Sadia, I. W., & Suastra, I. W. 2014. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Perubahan Konseptual terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi IPA. 4, 1-12.

Gadgil, S.& Nokes, T.J. 2009. Analogical Scaffolding in Collaborative Learning. Proceedings of Thirty first Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Societ.

Grimes, M. W. 2015. How Does Learning in Leadership Work? A Conceptual Change Perspective. Journal of Leadership Education, 14(4), 16-45.

Gunawan, G., Suranti, N. M. Y., Nisrina, N., & Herayanti, L. (2018). Studentsââ¬â¢ Problem-Solving Skill in Physics Teaching with Virtual Labs. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 2, 79-90.

Gunawan. (2017). Keterampilan Berpikir dalam Pembelajaran Sains. Mataram: Arga Puji Press.

Hamdani. 2011. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. CV Pustaka Setia: Bandung.

Hariawan, Kamaluddin, &Wahyono, U. 2013. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Creative ProblemSolving terhadap Kemampuan Memecahkan Masalah Fisika pada Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri 4 Palu. JurnalPendidikan Fisika Tadulako, 1(2), 48-54.

Hastuti, A., Sahidu, H., & Gunawan, G. (2017). Pengaruh Model PBL Berbantuan Media Virtual Tehadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 2(3), 129-135.

Huriawati, F., Handhika, J., & Luthfiaturrohmah. 2016. ââ¬ÅPenerapan Media praktikum Gerak Harmonik Sederhana Menggunakan Osilator Digital Detector untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Keterampilan Proses Mahasiswaââ¬Â, dalam Seminar Nasional Fisika dan Aplikasinya, Madiun: Pendidikan Fisika IKIP PGRI.

Husniyah, A., Yuliati, L., & Mufti, N. 2016. Pengaruh Permasalahan Isomorfik Terhadap Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah Materi Gerak Harmonis SederhanaSiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 4(1), 36-44.

Ibrahim, I., Kosim, K., & Gunawan, G. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Conceptual Understanding Procedures (CUPs) Berbantuan LKPD terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 3(1), 14-23.

Kang, H., Scharmann, L. C., Kang, S., & Noh, T. Cogninitive Conflict and Situational Interest as Factors Influencing Conceptual Changes. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 5(4), 383 ââ¬â 405.

Makhrus, M. 2018. Validitas Model Pembelajaran Conceptual Change Model with Cognitive Conflict Approach. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 3(1), 62-66.

Makhrus, M., Nur, M., & Widodo, W. 2014. Model Perubahan Konseptual dengan Pendekatan Konflik kognitif (MPK-PKK). JurnalPijar (ISSN: 1907-1744). Vol.9 No.1: 20-25.

Ozkan, G. & Selcuk, G. S. 2012. How Effective Is ââ¬ÅConceptual Change Approachââ¬Â In Teaching Physics?. Journal of Educational And Instructional Studies In The World, 2(2), 182-190.

Ozkan, G. & Selcuk, G. S. 2015. Effect of Technology Enhanced Conceptual Change Texts on Studentsââ¬â¢ Understanding of Buoyant Force. Universal Journal of Educational Research 3(12): 981-988.

Redhana, I. W., Sudria, I. B. N., Hidayat, I., & Merta, L. M. 2017. Identification of Chemistry Learning Problems Viewed from Conceptual Change Model. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 356-364.

Rusman. 2016. Model-Model Pembelajaran: Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sarar, M. M. A. 2014. The Effect of Using Stepanââ¬â¢s Model of Conceptual Change on The Modification of Alternative Mathematical Concepts and The Ability of Solving Mathematical Problems of Ninth Grade Students in Jordan. European Scientific Journal, 10(22), 191-203.

Selcuk, G. S., Caliskan, S., & Erol, M. 2008. The Effect Of Problem Solving Instruction on Physics Achiement, Problem Solving Performance and Strategiy Use. American Journal Of Physics Education, 2(3), 151-165.

Suparno, P. 2013. Miskonsepsi Perubahan Konsep dalam Pendidikan Fisika. Jakaerta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Tuqalby, R., Sutrio, & Gunawan. (2017). Pengaruh Strategi Konflik Kognitif Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep pada Materi Fluida Siswa SMAN 3 Mataram Tahun Ajaran 2016/2017. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 3(1), 8-13.

Venisari, R., Gunawan, G., & Sutrio, S. (2017). Penerapan Metode Mind Mapping pada Model Direct Instruction untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika Siswa SMPN 16 Mataram. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 1(3), 193-199.

Vitasari, N. & Trisniawati. 2017. Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Mahasiswa PGSD Universitas Sarjana Wiyata Taman Siswa Melalui Problem Posing. Jurnal Taman Cendekia, 1(2), 78-86.

Walsh, I. N., Howard, R. G., & Bowe, B. 2007. Phenomenography Study of Studentsââ¬â¢ Problem Solving Approaches in Physic. Physical Review Special Topics-Physic Education Research, (0nline,3, 020108).

Wena, M. 2014. Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontemporer. Jakarta Timur: PT Bumi Aksara.

Yumusak, A., Maras, I., & Sahin, M. 2015. Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction with Conceptual Change Texts on Removing the Misconceptions of Radioactivity. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 3(2),23-50.

Author Biographies

Siti Zaenab, Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, Universitas Mataram

Muh. Makhrus, Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, Universitas Mataram

I Wayan Gunada, Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, Universitas Mataram

License

Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi (JPFT) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi (JPFT).
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.