Gender Based Analysis of PjBL STEM Capability in Learning Environmental Pollution

Authors

  • Syarifa Wahidah Al-Idrus Pendidikan Kimia, FKIP, Universitas Mataram
  • Rahmawati Rahmawati Pendidikan Kimia, FKIP, Universitas Mataram

Keywords:

PjBL STEM, Gender, environmental pollution

Abstract

This research aims to determine the comparison of the implementation of PjBL with the STEM model based on gender. The type of research used is a One-Shot Case Study, namely an experiment carried out without a comparison group. All groups were given learning using PjBL STEM. The STEM aspects observed in this research are aspects of science (S), science–technology (S–T), science–engineering (S–E), and science–mathematics (S–M). The data collection method uses a series of questionnaires and tests. Data analysis uses N-gain to see an increase in learning outcomes regarding environmental pollution material. The research results show that STEM applications are not influenced by gender. It can be seen that student learning outcomes have increased with average N_gain of 0.92 and 0.83 respectively (high category).

References

Afriana, Permanasari, & Fitriani. Project Based Learning Integrated To Stem To Enhance Elementary School’s Students Scientific Literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. Vol 5(2).

Arends, R. 2012. Learning to teach (9th Editio). New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Baran, M. & Maskan, A. (2010). The Effect of project-based learning on pre-service

physics teachers’ electrostatic achievements. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 5,

Bybee, R. W. 2010. Advancing STEM Education: A 2020 Vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70

Cooper & Heaverlo, 2013. Problem Solving And Creativity And Design: What Influence Do They Have On Girls’ Interest In STEM Subject Areas?. American Journal of Engineering Education – Spring. Special Edition Vol 4(1)

Gocen, A., & Sen, S. 2021. A Validation of Servant Leadership Scale on Multinational Sample.Psychological Reports,124(2)

Gunawan & liliasari. 2012. Model Virtual Laboratory Fisika Modern untuk Meningkatkan Disposisi Berpikir Kritis Calon Guru. Cakrawala Pendidikan. vol 2(1)

Hango, D. 2013. Gender differences in science, technology, engineering, mathematics and computer science (STEM) programs at university Insights on Canadian Society. In Insights on Canadian Society (pp. 1–11).

Jannah, F., Fadly, W., & Aristiawan, A. (2021). Analisis karakter rasa ingin tahu siswa pada tema struktur dan fungsi tumbuhan. Jurnal Tadris IPA Indonesia, 1(1), 1–16

Kapila, V. & Iskander, M., 2014. Lessons Learned from Conducting a K-12 Project to Revitalize Achievement by using Instrumentation in Science Education. Journal of STEM Education Vol 15 (1)

Kemdikbud. (2014). Materi pelatihan guru implementasi kurikulum 2013 tahun ajaran 2014/2015: Mata pelajaran IPA SMP/MTs. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Kulturel-Konak, S., D’Allegro, M. Lou, & Dickinson, S. (2011). Review of gender differences in learning styles: Suggestions for STEM education. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, CIER. Vol 4(3)

OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. OECD Publishing

Ormancı, Ü. (2020). Thematic content analysis of doctoral theses in STEM education: Turkey context. Journal of Turkish Science Education,17(1),

Rouquette A, Hardouin J-B, Vanhaesebrouck A, Sébille V, Coste J (2019) Differential Item Functioning (DIF) in composite health measurement scale: Recommendations for characterizing DIF with meaningful consequences within the Rasch model framework. PLoS ONE 14(4)

Sumartati, L. (2020). Pendekatan Science, Technology, Engineering And Mathematics Dalam Pembelajaran Kimia 4.0. JENTRE, 1(1), 1-8.

Vennix, J., den Brok, P., & Taconis, R. (2018). Do outreach activities in secondary STEM education motivate students and improve their attitudes towards STEM?. International Journal of Science Education, 40(11).

Yalçin, S. A., Turgut, Ü., & Büyükkasap, E. (2009). The effect of project based learning on science undergraduates’ learning of electricity, attitude towards physics and scientific process skills.International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(1),

Ying-Tien Wu, Y & Anderson, O. R. 2015. Technology-enhanced stem (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) education. J. Comput. Educ. 2(3):245–249 DOI 10.1007/s40692-015-0041-2

Zulfa, A. R., & Rosyidah, Z. (2020). Analysis Of Communication Skills Of Junior High School Students On Classification Of Living Things Topic. Integrative Science Education and Teaching Activity Journal, 1(1)

Published

2024-05-31

How to Cite

Al-Idrus, S. W., & Rahmawati, R. (2024). Gender Based Analysis of PjBL STEM Capability in Learning Environmental Pollution. Chemistry Education Practice, 7(1), 123–127. Retrieved from https://jurnalfkip.unram.ac.id/index.php/CEP/article/view/2809

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.