Needs Analysis for the Development of the CHEM-RILW (Chemistry Real Integrated Laboratory Work) Learning Model in Chemistry Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29303/cep.v8i1.8846Keywords:
Needs Analysis, CHEM-RILW, Argumentation, Indigenous Science, Interpretation SkillsAbstract
This study aims to analyze the need for further development of the CHEM-RILW model, an extension of the previously developed ILW model. The respondents involved in this study included two lecturers (N = 2) and forty-seven chemistry students (N = 47). Data was collected using observation sheets, questionnaires, critical thinking tests, and rubrics for argumentation and communication skills. The results indicated that the implementation of the learning process successfully integrated investigative activities carried out in the laboratory. This integration demonstrated that the pre-laboratory, laboratory, and post-laboratory stages were effectively implemented. However, the previous model did not sufficiently enhance students' interpretation and presentation skills. Additionally, the human element was not adequately emphasized, which limited the development of students' argumentation skills. Analysis of the lecturer questionnaire revealed a need to improve the learning model by incorporating more real-world applications of theory. Based on these findings, it is clear that further development of the ILW model is necessary. The CHEM-RILW model, as an enhancement, introduces real-world aspects and emphasizes the human element in learning, highlighting the relevance of community science in the context of chemistry concepts.
References
Al-Ajmi, B., & Ambusaidi, A. (2022). The Level of Scientific Argumentation Skills in Chemistry Subject among Grade 11th Students: The Role of Logical Thinking. Science Education International, 33(1), 66-74. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v33.i1.7
Altowaiji, S., Haddadin, R., Campos, P., Sorn, S., Gonzalez, L., Villafan, S.M., & Groves, M.N. (2021). Measuring the effectiveness of online preparation videos and questions in the second semester general chemistry laboratory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22, 616-625
Anwar, Y.A.S., & Muti’ah, M. (2022). Exploration of critical thinking and self-regulated learning in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Biochemistry and Molecular Education, 50(5), 502-509. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21655
Anwar, Y. A.S, Junaidi, E., & Dewi, Y.K. (2024). Exploring the implementation of stepwise inquiry-based learning in higher education. Chemistry Teacher International, 6(3), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2023-0081
Cáceres-Jensen, L., J. Rodríguez-Becerra, B. Jorquera-Moreno., M. Escudey., S. Druker-Ibañez., J. Hernández-Ramos, T. Díaz-Arce, J. Pernaa., & M. Aksela. (2021). Learning Reaction Kinetics through Sustainable Chemistry of Herbicides: A Case Study of Preservice Chemistry Teachers’ Perceptions of Problem-Based Technology Enhanced Learning. Journal of Chemical Education. 98(5), 1571–1582.
Costello T, Logue P, Dunne K. An evaluation of the effects of pre-laboratory activities on student engagement in a higher education computer engineering module. AISHE-J. 2022;14(2): 1–34.
Dong, A., Jong, M.S.Y., & King, R.B. (2020). How Does Prior Knowledge Influence Learning Engagement? The Mediating Roles of Cognitive Load and Help-Seeking. Front. Psychol., 11, 591203. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591203
Drame, I., Gibson, C.M., Nonyel, N.P., et al. (2022). Strategies for incorporating health disparities and cultural competency training into the pharmacy curriculum and co-curriculum. Am J Pharm Educ., 86(3), 8631. https://doi.org/10.5688 /ajpe8631 PMid:35027357
Ho, K., Smith, S.R., Venter, C., & Clark, D.B. (2021). Case study analysis of reflective essays by chemistry post-secondary students within a lab-based community service learning water project. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22, 973-984.
Johnstone, A.H. (2006). Chemical education research in glasgow in perspective. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(2), 49-63. doi: 10.1039/B5RP90021B
Kelly OC, Finlayson OE. Providing solutions through problem-based learning for the undergraduate 1st year chemistry laboratory. Chem Educ Res Pract. 2007;8(3):347–61
Labarca, M., & Lombardi, O. (2007). The philosophy of chemistry as a new resource for chemistry education. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(1), 187-192. doi: 10.1021/ed084p187
OECD. (2024). Future of Education and Skills 2030 | OECD
Mahaffy, P. (2011). The Human Element: Chemistry Education's Contribution to Our Global Future. In The Chemical Element: Chemistry's Contribution to Our Global Future, First Edition. Garcia-Martinez, J., & Serrano-Torregrosa, E.(Eds). Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
Petritis SJ, Kelly C, Talanquer V. Exploring the impact of the framing of a laboratory experiment on the nature of student argumentation. Chem Educ Res Pract. 2021,22:105–21.
Quoc, N.L. (2022). Factors Affecting Consecutive Interpretation: An Investigation from L2 Learners’ Perspectives. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6 (10), 791-812.
Seery MK, Jones AB, Mein T. Unfinished recipe: structuring upper division laboratory work to scaffold experimental design skills. J Chem Educ. 2019;96(1):53–9
Seery M. K., (2020), Establishing the laboratory as the place to learn how to do chemistry, J. Chem. Educ., 97(6), 1511–1514.
Shallcross DE, Harrison TG, Shaw AJ, Shallcross KL, roker SJ, Norman NC. Lessons in effective practical chemistry at tertiary level: case studies from a chemistry outreach program. High Educ Stud. 2013;3(5):1–10.
Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning difficults in chemistry: an overview. Journal of Turkish Science education, 4(2), 2-20. Retrieved from http://www.tused.org/internet/tufed/arsiv/v4/i2/metin/tusedv4i2s1.pdf.
Talanquer, V. (2010). Macro, submicro, and symbolic: the many faces of the chemistry “Triplet”. International Journal of Science Education, 37(2), 1-17. doi: 10.1080/09500690903386435.
Wang, H-H., Hong, Z-R., She, H-C., Smith, T.J., Fielding, J., & Lin, H-S. (2022). The role of structured inquiry, open inquiry, and epistemological beliefs in developing secondary students’ scientifc and mathematical literacies. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(14), 1-17. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00329-z
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Eka Junaidi, Yunita Arian Sani Anwar , Muti'ah Muti'ah, Syarifa Wahdia Al Idrus, Ermia Hidayanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Chemistry Education Practice agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Chemistry Education Practice.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
